Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway defies subpoena for House testimony

Politics

White House adviser Kellyanne Conway speaks to reporters at the White House in Washington, U.S., July 9, 2019. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – White House senior adviser Kellyanne Conway defied a subpoena and failed to appear on Monday at a congressional hearing about allegations she violated the Hatch Act, a law that limits federal employees’ political activity.

The top White House lawyer directed Conway not to appear at the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee hearing, arguing that current and former White House officials were “absolutely immune” from being required to testify before Congress, according to a letter released by the committee.

Three weeks ago, Conway declined to appear voluntarily at a similar hearing before the committee, prompting it to vote 25-16 to subpoena her testimony.

Past presidential administrations from both parties have adopted similar arguments, but some legal experts have said such immunity claims would be rejected by a judge if challenged in court.

The White House said in a statement that Monday’s hearing was part of a “purely political campaign to harass the President and his close advisers.”

President Donald Trump is stonewalling multiple congressional inquiries into him, his policies, family and business holdings.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC), a U.S. government watchdog agency, last month recommended Conway be fired for repeatedly violating the Hatch Act by disparaging Democratic presidential candidates while speaking in her official capacity during television interviews and on social media.

Henry Kerner, a longtime Republican Party lawyer who runs the OSC, told last month’s committee hearing that Conway left him “no choice” but to recommend her termination because she had committed “at least 10 separate Hatch Act violations, expressed no remorse and continues to express disdain” for the law.

The White House has argued that the OSC has adopted a legally dubious interpretation of the Hatch Act that chills the free-speech rights of U.S. government employees.

Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Peter Cooney

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

General Electric fortifies defense against charges of bogus accounting
Planned Parenthood opts out of U.S. subsidies in fight over abortion referrals
Dubai uses extreme cold cryotherapy to treat racehorses in world first
Paco León responde a la censura de su último desnudo en Instagram
Aragonès anuncia que llevará al Gobierno a los tribunales por impagos

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *